You are encouraged to independently verify all information you deem relevant when evaluating a financial advisor. Such experiences and opinions may differ from client to client, and may differ from your experience and opinion should you choose to retain such financial advisor. Indyfin and/or a financial advisor may have contacted a financial advisor's clients to leave a review and rating, or a financial advisor's client may have independently elected to post a review and rating of their own volition. The reviews and ratings of a financial advisor's clients are solely for your informational purposes only, and reflects the experience and opinion of such clients. You retain the sole and absolute discretion to retain or not to retain any financial advisor, and Indyfin is not in a position to determine whether a particular financial advisor is appropriate for your specific financial situation. Prospective clients of a financial advisor are highly encouraged to read such financial advisor's Form ADV Part 2 brochure, and, if applicable, Form CRS relationship summary. Indyfin makes no representation of what your particular experience with any financial advisor may be, and cannot guarantee the success of any particular investment that may be recommended or implemented by any financial advisor. This Website is designed to serve as an educational tool to assist and inform potential clients of independent and unaffiliated financial advisors, and should not be the sole means by which a prospective client evaluates the suitability of any specific financial advisor.
JIM FINK INVESTING PROFESSIONAL
Though Indyfin is a registered investment adviser, this Website is not intended to provide any investment, financial, legal, compliance, tax, or other professional advice, and nothing contained herein should be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security or other financial product. The sources of third-party content are independent of and unaffiliated with Indyfin. The financial advisor referenced in the above Webpage has not provided any information to us, however, certain financial advisors, unaffiliated with us have created a profile on this Website have supplied their information directly to us.
JIM FINK INVESTING WINDOWS
This website, the contents of this page (the “Webpage”), and any additional hyperlinked pages or pop-up windows (collectively, this "Website") have been derived primarily from information by independent third-party sources believed to be reliable including Investment Advisor Public Disclosure website (). The fees billed are most likely to include any Percentage of AUM, Fixed Fees and Performance Based Fees.
provides services, such as Financial planning services, Portfolio management for individuals and/or small businesses, Portfolio management for businesses (other than small businesses) or institutional clients (other than registered investment companies and other pooled investment vehicles and), Pension consulting services and Selection of other advisers. The fees charged by financial advisory firms depended on the types of services they perform for each client. advisor’s have 869,177 clients accounts with over $257,192,420,358 assets under management. is a financial advisory firm with offices in Greenwich, CT.
JIM FINK INVESTING LICENSE
James Fink has successfully gained the Series 66 license allowing them to perform the duties of an Securities Agent & Investment Advisor and work in Connecticut. James Fink has been working for 19 years in roles with increasing responsibilities for Raymond James & Associates INC. While positive and significant risk-adjusted performance is observed for some option portfolios, greater risk tolerance relative to the long index benchmark portfolio is required.James Fink is on the team of advisors at Raymond James & Associates INC. This result is dependent on restricting option investment relative to the maximum allowable margin. However, a portfolio that incorporates written options can outperform the benchmark on a raw and risk-adjusted basis. The analysis reveals that including options in the portfolio most often results in underperformance relative to the benchmark portfolio. This allows the marginal impact of including options in the portfolio to be examined. Raw and risk-adjusted returns of option portfolios are compared to a benchmark portfolio that is only long the underlying asset. Each option portfolio is formed using options with different maturities and moneyness, while incorporating bid-ask spreads, transaction costs, and margin requirements. This paper examines the historical performance of 12 portfolios that include S&P 100/500 index options.
0 kommentar(er)
